Sued by Midland Credit Management in New York? Here's What to Do Next

2015 · consent order

$42M in consumer refunds + $10M civil penalty; ceased collection on $125M in debt

CFPB found that Encore, Midland Funding, and Midland Credit Management violated the FDCPA, CFPA, and Fair Credit Reporting Act by collecting on debts they could not substantiate, filing misleading affidavits in court, and pursuing debts past the statute of limitations.

CFPB source

2020 · lawsuit settled

$15M civil penalty + consumer redress

CFPB sued Encore and its subsidiaries for violating the 2015 consent order — including continuing to collect on time-barred debt without required disclosures. The settlement extended the conduct provisions of the 2015 order for five additional years.

CFPB source

Statute of Limitations Defense

In New York, the statute of limitations for credit card debt is 3 years. If your last payment was more than 3 years ago, the debt is time-barred. Midland Credit Management has been the subject of CFPB findings related to suing on time-barred debts — check your dates carefully and raise the SOL defense in your Answer.

Lack of Standing / Chain of Title

As a debt buyer, Midland Credit Management must prove they actually purchased your specific account. Demand the complete chain of title — the purchase agreement, bill of sale, and assignment documents. In New York courts, failing to produce this documentation can result in dismissal.

Challenge the Amount

Demand a complete accounting from the original creditor's last statement through the current claimed balance. Any unauthorized fees, post-charge-off interest, or collection costs not in the original agreement should be disputed line by line.

New York Wage Garnishment Exemptions

Only 10% of gross wages. Wages under 30x minimum wage are completely exempt. Very protective.

New York General Business Law Article 22-A / NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection Rules

In addition to the federal FDCPA, New York's New York General Business Law Article 22-A / NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection Rules may provide additional protections and remedies against Midland Credit Management's collection practices.

New York Court System

Small claims limit $10,000 ($5,000 in town/village courts). Civil court handles cases up to $50,000. Supreme court for larger. Filing fees in New York typically range $35-$350.

Who is Midland Credit Management?

Midland Credit Management (MCM) is a debt collection company and subsidiary of Encore Capital Group. They purchase defaulted debts from banks and other creditors, then aggressively pursue collection including filing lawsuits.

How do I respond to a Midland Credit Management lawsuit?

You must file a written Answer with the court before your state's response deadline. In your Answer, you should deny the allegations you dispute, raise affirmative defenses like statute of limitations or lack of standing, and demand they prove they own the debt.

Can Midland Credit Management garnish my wages?

Only after they obtain a court judgment against you. If you do not respond to the lawsuit, they will get a default judgment. Some states like Texas, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina do not allow wage garnishment for consumer debts.

What if Midland Credit Management is reporting wrong information?

If MCM is reporting inaccurate debt information to credit bureaus, this may violate the FDCPA and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). You can dispute the information with the credit bureaus and file complaints with the CFPB.

Is Midland Credit Management the same as Midland Funding?

Midland Funding LLC is the entity that purchases the debts, while Midland Credit Management is the collection arm that contacts consumers. Both are subsidiaries of Encore Capital Group and often appear together in lawsuits.

How long to respond in New York?

20 days if served in person. 30 days if served by other methods. Check your summons carefully.

What is the statute of limitations for credit card debt in New York?

3 years as of April 2022 under the new law. Previously it was 6 years. This is one of the shortest credit card SOLs in the country.

Can they garnish my wages in New York?

Only 10% of gross wages, and wages under 30 times the minimum wage are completely exempt. New York is one of the most protective states for wage garnishment.

What is the new Comprehensive Debt Collection Rules in NYC?

New York City has enacted strict rules governing debt collection, including requirements for additional disclosures and restrictions on collection practices within the city.

Where are debt lawsuits filed in New York?

Most consumer debt cases are filed in city civil court. Small claims up to $10,000 in NYC. Supreme court for larger amounts.

How did the Consumer Credit Fairness Act change the statute of limitations in New York?

The Consumer Credit Fairness Act, effective April 7, 2022, made one of the most significant pro-consumer changes to debt-collection law in any state. It amended N.Y. CPLR § 213-A to shorten the statute of limitations on consumer credit transactions from six years to three years, reaching credit-card debts, auto-loan deficiencies, store cards, and most other consumer credit. The three-year period generally runs from the date of default. Critically, the new shorter period applies to actions filed on or after April 7, 2022, even if the underlying debt is older. That means many actions on credit-card debts that would have been timely under the old six-year rule are now time-barred. If you have been sued in New York on a consumer credit debt, the very first thing to check is the date of default and whether the action was filed within three years of that date. If not, the case is time-barred and you have a complete defense, which you must raise in your answer. Many older default judgments may also be vacatable under CCFA changes.

What are the new affidavit and pleading requirements for collection lawsuits in NY?

The Consumer Credit Fairness Act added detailed pleading requirements in CPLR § 3015(i) and affidavit requirements for default judgments in CPLR § 3215(i) for consumer credit transactions. The complaint must include specific information about the debt, including the name of the original creditor, the account number, the date of default, and an itemization of the amount claimed including principal, interest, fees, and any payments. For default judgments, the plaintiff must submit affidavits of merit from the original creditor or its custodian (in many situations), proof of chain of title where the plaintiff is a debt buyer, and evidence of mailing notice to the consumer at the address provided by the court clerk. These requirements are strict, and many debt-buyer plaintiffs have struggled to comply, leading to denial of default judgments and dismissals. If you have been sued, review the complaint against these requirements; missing elements can be raised in a motion to dismiss or as a basis to oppose default.

Can a NY collector freeze my bank account, and what protections do I have?

Yes, a collector with a money judgment can serve a restraining notice and information subpoena on your bank, and the bank will typically freeze the funds in your account. New York provides important protections through the Exempt Income Protection Act (EIPA), codified in CPLR § 5222-a. The bank is required to automatically protect $3,600 in your account when a restraining notice is served, without you having to claim the exemption. The bank must also automatically protect up to two months of exempt federal benefits such as Social Security, SSI, VA, and pensions when those benefits arrive by direct deposit. Above those automatic floors, you can claim additional exemptions by completing the EIPA exemption claim form sent by the bank or by filing your own motion in court. New York exempts a wide range of income including 90 percent of wages received in the past 60 days, pension and retirement payments, public assistance, child support, and unemployment. Act quickly to file claims before the levy is executed.

I have an old default judgment from before April 2022. Can I get it vacated?

Possibly yes. The Consumer Credit Fairness Act includes provisions allowing courts to vacate certain pre-existing default judgments and gives consumers a path to challenge old judgments that would not have met the new pleading and affidavit standards. Independently of CCFA, New York courts can vacate default judgments under CPLR § 5015 for reasons including lack of personal jurisdiction (often called sewer service), excusable default, or newly discovered evidence. The grounds for vacatur are broad if you act with reasonable diligence after learning of the judgment and can show a meritorious defense such as time-barred debt under the new three-year SOL, lack of standing of the debt buyer, or improper service. Successful vacatur reopens the case and returns the parties to where they would have been at filing, which often leads to dismissal. If you are dealing with an old NY default judgment, talk to a consumer law attorney about whether CCFA or CPLR 5015 vacatur is available.

Can a debt collector contact me about a debt that is more than three years old in NY?

A collector can ask you voluntarily to pay an old debt, but they cannot sue, threaten to sue, or imply that legal action is available on a debt that is time-barred. Under the Consumer Credit Fairness Act, the limitations period on consumer credit transactions in New York is now three years from default, so a credit-card debt more than three years past default is time-barred. Threatening or filing a suit on a time-barred debt violates the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. § 1692e, and likely also violates NY GBL § 349 and 23 NYCRR Part 1. New York also requires specific disclosures on collection communications regarding time-barred debts, and CFPB Regulation F now requires similar disclosures. If you make a partial payment or a written acknowledgment on a time-barred debt, you may revive the limitations period in some circumstances, so think carefully before paying or signing anything related to an old debt. Document any threats and consider an FDCPA counterclaim.

What does 23 NYCRR Part 1 require collectors to do that the FDCPA does not?

23 NYCRR Part 1, the New York Department of Financial Services debt collection rule, layers detailed requirements on top of the federal FDCPA. Among the key requirements: collectors must provide initial written disclosures within five days of first communication, including specific itemization of the debt and information about the original creditor; collectors must provide substantiation of the debt (account-level documents, signed contracts, statements showing how the balance was calculated) upon written request, and cannot continue collecting until substantiation is provided; collectors must disclose time-barred status with specific statutory language; and collectors must follow strict rules about communication frequency, voicemails, and electronic communications. Violations of 23 NYCRR Part 1 can support state administrative complaints to DFS and the Attorney General, and many violations also constitute deceptive practices under NY GBL § 349. The combination of federal FDCPA, 23 NYCRR Part 1, CCFA, and GBL § 349 gives New York consumers among the strongest collection-defense toolkits in the country.