Sued by Pressler, Feltner, Shidlovsky & Zangari in California? Here's What to Do Next

2016 · consent order

$1M CFPB civil money penalty against Pressler & Pressler and named partners; companion $1.5M penalty against affiliated debt buyer New Century Financial Services

CFPB consent order finding Pressler & Pressler used an automated claim-preparation system and non-attorney staff to mass-produce hundreds of thousands of debt collection lawsuits against consumers without meaningful attorney involvement and without reviewing account-level documentation to confirm debts were owed, in violation of the FDCPA and Dodd-Frank Act. The order required real attorney review and verified documentation before filing future suits.

CFPB source

Statute of Limitations Defense

In California, the statute of limitations for credit card debt is 4 years. If your last payment was more than 4 years ago, the debt is time-barred. Verify when your last payment or account activity occurred and raise the SOL defense in your Answer if applicable.

Challenge the Amount

Demand a complete accounting from the original creditor's last statement through the current claimed balance. Any unauthorized fees, post-charge-off interest, or collection costs not in the original agreement should be disputed line by line.

California Wage Garnishment Exemptions

Greater of 75% of disposable earnings or 40x California minimum wage is exempt. More protective than federal law.

Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code 1788)

In addition to the federal FDCPA, California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code 1788) may provide additional protections and remedies against Pressler, Feltner, Shidlovsky & Zangari's collection practices.

California Court System

Small claims limit $12,500. Unlimited civil for amounts over $35,000. Limited civil for $35,000 and under. Filing fees in California typically range $75-$435.

Who is Pressler Feltner?

Pressler, Feltner, Shidlovsky & Zangari is a high-volume debt collection law firm based in New Jersey. They file tens of thousands of lawsuits per year, primarily for debt buyers like LVNV Funding and Midland Credit Management.

Why is Pressler Feltner suing me?

They are representing a debt buyer or creditor who claims you owe a debt. They are acting as the law firm filing the lawsuit — the actual plaintiff is the creditor or debt buyer named in the complaint.

Are there errors in Pressler Feltner lawsuits?

Yes. Because they file such a high volume of cases, errors are common — wrong names, incorrect amounts, expired statutes of limitations, and missing documentation. Review every detail in the complaint carefully.

Do I need a lawyer to fight Pressler Feltner?

You do not need a lawyer to file your Answer, but it can help. Our service prepares your Answer and identifies if FDCPA violations occurred that would qualify you for free attorney representation.

Can Pressler Feltner get a default judgment against me?

Yes, and they do — thousands per year. If you do not file your Answer by the deadline, the court will enter a default judgment allowing wage garnishment, bank levies, and property liens.

How long do I have to respond to a debt lawsuit in California?

30 days from personal service (or 35 if served by mail) to file your Answer with the court.

What is the statute of limitations for credit card debt in California?

4 years under CCP 337 for obligations based on a written contract. 2 years for oral contracts.

What is the Rosenthal Act?

The Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act extends FDCPA-like protections to original creditors in California, not just third-party collectors. This gives California consumers broader protection.

Can they garnish my wages in California?

Yes, but California is more protective than federal law. The greater of 75% of disposable earnings or 40 times the California state minimum wage is exempt from garnishment.

What courts handle debt cases in California?

Small claims for amounts up to $12,500, limited civil for up to $35,000, and unlimited civil for larger amounts.

What is the California Fair Debt Buyer Practices Act and how does it help me?

The California Fair Debt Buyer Practices Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788.50-1788.66, imposes strict requirements on debt buyers (companies that purchase charged-off debts and sue to collect). Under § 1788.58, the plaintiff debt buyer must attach to the complaint copies of the contract or other writing evidencing the original debt, the chain of assignment from the original creditor, and an itemized account statement showing how the balance was calculated. The plaintiff must also plead specific facts under § 1788.58, including the date of default, the original creditor's name, and the date of charge-off. Failure to comply is grounds for dismissal under § 1788.60. The FDBPA also provides for statutory damages up to $1,000 per action plus attorney's fees under § 1788.62. If you are sued by a debt buyer in California, check the complaint immediately for compliance and raise any deficiencies in your Answer or by demurrer.

How is the Rosenthal Act different from the federal FDCPA?

The federal FDCPA at 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p only covers third-party debt collectors, not the original creditor that issued the debt. California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788-1788.33) closes that gap by applying FDCPA-style rules to original creditors collecting their own debts. Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.17 incorporates most of the FDCPA's substantive prohibitions, so Rosenthal violations include false statements, harassment, validation failures, and collecting time-barred debts. Remedies under Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.30 include actual damages, statutory damages up to $1,000 per action, and attorney's fees. That means if Capital One or Discover (collecting their own accounts) violates the FDCPA-style rules, you have a Rosenthal claim even though the federal FDCPA would not reach them. Pair a Rosenthal counterclaim with an FDCPA claim under § 1692k whenever a third-party collector is involved.

Can a debt collector garnish my wages in California?

California has stronger wage protections than the federal floor. Under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 706.050, the maximum garnishment is the lesser of (a) 25% of weekly disposable earnings or (b) 50% of the amount by which weekly disposable earnings exceed 40 times the state minimum wage. With California's 2026 state minimum wage of $16.50, that translates to a substantial weekly exemption that is more protective than the federal 30x minimum-wage floor under 15 U.S.C. § 1673. To claim the exemption, file a Claim of Exemption (form EJ-160) with the levying officer and serve a copy on the creditor. The creditor must then file a Notice of Opposition or release the funds. Social Security, SSI, and VA benefits are fully protected under federal law (42 U.S.C. § 407) regardless of the state cap, and California also exempts unemployment, disability, and public assistance under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 704.080.

How long does a debt collector have to sue in California?

California's statute of limitations for written contracts, including credit cards, is four years under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 337. The clock starts on the date of default, typically the date of the last payment. Oral contracts have a two-year SOL under § 339. Once the four years run, the debt is time-barred, and a collector who sues anyway commits a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(2) and § 1692f(1) of the FDCPA, as well as Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.17 (Rosenthal Act). California also has unique protections under the Fair Debt Buyer Practices Act: a debt buyer who knowingly sues on time-barred debt can be liable for statutory damages plus attorney's fees. Critically, in California a partial payment or written acknowledgment can restart the SOL under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 360, so do not pay or sign anything on an old debt without understanding the consequences.

What is the meet-and-confer requirement in California debt cases?

California limited civil cases include several procedural protections for consumers. Under California Rules of Court, Rule 3.724, parties must meet and confer at least 30 days before the initial case management conference to discuss the case, settlement options, and discovery. For debt collection cases under Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788.50-1788.66, the plaintiff must have attached the original contract, the chain of assignment, and an itemized statement to the complaint. If the documents are missing or incomplete, raise that immediately. California also offers a streamlined limited civil discovery process under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 94-95, allowing each party to use 35 interrogatories and other limited tools. Even at this stage, an Answer that raises statute of limitations, Rosenthal Act violations, FDBPA documentation deficiencies, and FDCPA validation failures often pressures the debt buyer to dismiss or settle. Most California consumer debt cases that go beyond the initial filing collapse on documentary deficiencies.