Sued by Pressler, Feltner, Shidlovsky & Zangari in New Mexico? Here's What to Do Next

2016 · consent order

$1M CFPB civil money penalty against Pressler & Pressler and named partners; companion $1.5M penalty against affiliated debt buyer New Century Financial Services

CFPB consent order finding Pressler & Pressler used an automated claim-preparation system and non-attorney staff to mass-produce hundreds of thousands of debt collection lawsuits against consumers without meaningful attorney involvement and without reviewing account-level documentation to confirm debts were owed, in violation of the FDCPA and Dodd-Frank Act. The order required real attorney review and verified documentation before filing future suits.

CFPB source

Statute of Limitations Defense

In New Mexico, the statute of limitations for credit card debt is 6 years. If your last payment was more than 6 years ago, the debt is time-barred. Verify when your last payment or account activity occurred and raise the SOL defense in your Answer if applicable.

Challenge the Amount

Demand a complete accounting from the original creditor's last statement through the current claimed balance. Any unauthorized fees, post-charge-off interest, or collection costs not in the original agreement should be disputed line by line.

New Mexico Wage Garnishment Exemptions

Greater of 75% of disposable earnings or 40x federal minimum wage exempt.

New Mexico Unfair Practices Act

In addition to the federal FDCPA, New Mexico's New Mexico Unfair Practices Act may provide additional protections and remedies against Pressler, Feltner, Shidlovsky & Zangari's collection practices.

New Mexico Court System

Magistrate court handles cases up to $10,000. District court for larger civil cases. Filing fees in New Mexico typically range $25-$200.

Who is Pressler Feltner?

Pressler, Feltner, Shidlovsky & Zangari is a high-volume debt collection law firm based in New Jersey. They file tens of thousands of lawsuits per year, primarily for debt buyers like LVNV Funding and Midland Credit Management.

Why is Pressler Feltner suing me?

They are representing a debt buyer or creditor who claims you owe a debt. They are acting as the law firm filing the lawsuit — the actual plaintiff is the creditor or debt buyer named in the complaint.

Are there errors in Pressler Feltner lawsuits?

Yes. Because they file such a high volume of cases, errors are common — wrong names, incorrect amounts, expired statutes of limitations, and missing documentation. Review every detail in the complaint carefully.

Do I need a lawyer to fight Pressler Feltner?

You do not need a lawyer to file your Answer, but it can help. Our service prepares your Answer and identifies if FDCPA violations occurred that would qualify you for free attorney representation.

Can Pressler Feltner get a default judgment against me?

Yes, and they do — thousands per year. If you do not file your Answer by the deadline, the court will enter a default judgment allowing wage garnishment, bank levies, and property liens.

How long to respond in New Mexico?

30 days from service.

What is the SOL in New Mexico?

6 years for written contracts. 4 years for oral contracts.

Can wages be garnished?

Yes. Greater of 75% of disposable earnings or 40x minimum wage is exempt.

Where are cases filed?

Magistrate court up to $10,000. District court for larger amounts.

Is the collection agency or debt buyer suing me licensed in New Mexico?

The New Mexico Collection Agency Regulatory Act, NMSA 61-18A-1 et seq., requires collection agencies and many debt buyers operating in the state to be licensed by the Regulation and Licensing Department. You can verify a license through the RLD's online licensee lookup. If the entity that sent you collection letters or filed suit was not licensed at the time of the conduct, that is a defense to the collection action and may support an administrative complaint and an Unfair Practices Act counterclaim. The chain of title matters too: in many debt-buyer cases the original creditor sold the debt through multiple intermediate buyers, and any unlicensed entity in that chain can be a problem for the plaintiff. Always start by checking the license status of the named plaintiff and any collection law firm sending correspondence on its behalf. Even when an agency is licensed, the bond requirement gives consumers another source of recovery for a judgment.

How long does a creditor have to sue me on a debt in New Mexico?

New Mexico's statute of limitations is six years on most written contracts (NMSA 37-1-3) and four years on open accounts and oral contracts (NMSA 37-1-4). Most credit-card and store-card agreements are treated as written contracts under the credit-card agreement itself, so the six-year period typically applies, though some New Mexico courts have applied four years to certain credit-card claims. The clock generally begins running from the date of last payment or default. Once the limit has run, the debt is time-barred and you have a complete defense, but you must raise the defense affirmatively in your answer. A time-barred debt remains payable voluntarily, but suing or threatening suit on a time-barred debt violates the FDCPA and the NM Unfair Practices Act. Be careful with partial payments and written acknowledgments, which can restart the clock in some circumstances. If unsure of dates, send a written validation request and pull your credit reports.

What does the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act add to my federal FDCPA rights?

The federal FDCPA regulates third-party debt collectors and debt buyers but generally does not reach the original creditor. The New Mexico Unfair Practices Act, NMSA 57-12-1 et seq., is broader and prohibits unfair, deceptive, or unconscionable trade practices by any business, including original creditors. Remedies include actual damages with a statutory floor, treble damages for unconscionable practices, mandatory attorney fees, and equitable relief. The UPA gives New Mexico consumers two layers of protection: an FDCPA claim against the third-party collector and a UPA claim against the underlying business or original creditor, which can substantially increase settlement value. The Consumer Protection Division within the New Mexico Department of Justice enforces the UPA and accepts complaints. Practical examples include misrepresented balances, deceptive validation responses, threats of action the collector did not intend to take, and continued collection after a written dispute without proper validation.

What if I live on a pueblo or reservation in New Mexico and I am being sued?

Tribal sovereignty creates important jurisdictional considerations in New Mexico collection cases. State courts generally do not have jurisdiction over a tribal member residing on a pueblo or reservation for a debt cause of action arising on the reservation, although the rules become more complex when the debt was incurred off-reservation or when the consumer engaged with non-tribal businesses outside the reservation. Service of process on a reservation must follow tribal rules and may not be effective if it does not. If you have been served with a state court collection lawsuit while living on a pueblo or reservation, get advice from a tribal court or a consumer law attorney familiar with these issues quickly, because the analysis is fact-specific and the deadlines to respond are short. Wage garnishment and bank levy enforcement against tribal members can also be limited. In any case, do not ignore the papers; raise the jurisdictional issue in writing and on the record.

How much can a New Mexico collector garnish from my wages?

New Mexico wage garnishment is calculated under NMSA 35-12-7 and related federal law. The maximum garnishment is the lesser of 25 percent of disposable earnings or the amount by which weekly disposable earnings exceed 40 times the federal minimum wage, which is more protective for lower-wage earners than the standard federal 30-times multiplier. Disposable earnings means earnings after legally required deductions. Federal benefits including Social Security, SSI, VA, and most federal pensions are fully exempt from garnishment by private creditors. Garnishment requires a judgment first; a collector who threatens immediate wage garnishment before getting a judgment is making a misleading statement and may violate the FDCPA. Once a garnishment is issued, you have the right to claim exemptions by filing the appropriate exemption claim with the court. Document any threats made before judgment and consider whether they support an FDCPA or NMSA 57-12 counterclaim.