Sued by Encore Capital Group in New Mexico? Here's What to Do Next

2015 · consent order

$52M+ total ($42M consumer refunds + $10M CFPB civil money penalty), plus order to stop collection on $125M+ in debts

CFPB consent order against Encore Capital Group, Midland Funding, Midland Credit Management, and Asset Acceptance finding the companies attempted to collect debts they didn't own or that were inaccurate, relied on robo-signed affidavits in court, and pressured consumers with misrepresentations about lawsuits. The order required documentation before filing suit and disclosures when collecting on time-barred debt.

CFPB source

2020 · lawsuit settled

$15M CFPB civil money penalty + $79,308.81 consumer redress; extended 2015 order conduct provisions for five additional years

CFPB filed suit and reached a stipulated settlement finding Encore and its subsidiaries violated the 2015 consent order by suing consumers without possessing required documentation, failing to provide required disclosures when consumers requested loan documentation, and suing on debts whose statutes of limitations had expired in violation of the FDCPA and CFPA.

CFPB source

Statute of Limitations Defense

In New Mexico, the statute of limitations for credit card debt is 6 years. If your last payment was more than 6 years ago, the debt is time-barred. Encore Capital Group has been the subject of CFPB findings related to suing on time-barred debts — check your dates carefully and raise the SOL defense in your Answer.

Lack of Standing / Chain of Title

As a debt buyer, Encore Capital Group must prove they actually purchased your specific account. Demand the complete chain of title — the purchase agreement, bill of sale, and assignment documents. In New Mexico courts, failing to produce this documentation can result in dismissal.

Challenge the Amount

Demand a complete accounting from the original creditor's last statement through the current claimed balance. Any unauthorized fees, post-charge-off interest, or collection costs not in the original agreement should be disputed line by line.

New Mexico Wage Garnishment Exemptions

Greater of 75% of disposable earnings or 40x federal minimum wage exempt.

New Mexico Unfair Practices Act

In addition to the federal FDCPA, New Mexico's New Mexico Unfair Practices Act may provide additional protections and remedies against Encore Capital Group's collection practices.

New Mexico Court System

Magistrate court handles cases up to $10,000. District court for larger civil cases. Filing fees in New Mexico typically range $25-$200.

What is Encore Capital Group?

Encore Capital Group is the largest publicly traded debt buyer in the U.S. They own LVNV Funding LLC and Midland Credit Management. If you are sued by either, Encore is the parent company.

Has the CFPB taken action against Encore?

Yes. The CFPB has ordered Encore subsidiaries to pay millions in fines and restitution for illegal debt collection practices including suing without proper documentation and collecting on time-barred debts.

Can I sue Encore Capital Group?

You would typically sue the subsidiary that contacted you (LVNV Funding or Midland Credit Management), but in some cases the parent company may also be liable for directing illegal collection practices.

How does Encore get my debt?

Encore purchases portfolios of thousands of defaulted accounts from banks and credit card companies, usually for 3-5 cents per dollar. They then attempt to collect the full original balance plus interest and fees.

How long to respond in New Mexico?

30 days from service.

What is the SOL in New Mexico?

6 years for written contracts. 4 years for oral contracts.

Can wages be garnished?

Yes. Greater of 75% of disposable earnings or 40x minimum wage is exempt.

Where are cases filed?

Magistrate court up to $10,000. District court for larger amounts.

Is the collection agency or debt buyer suing me licensed in New Mexico?

The New Mexico Collection Agency Regulatory Act, NMSA 61-18A-1 et seq., requires collection agencies and many debt buyers operating in the state to be licensed by the Regulation and Licensing Department. You can verify a license through the RLD's online licensee lookup. If the entity that sent you collection letters or filed suit was not licensed at the time of the conduct, that is a defense to the collection action and may support an administrative complaint and an Unfair Practices Act counterclaim. The chain of title matters too: in many debt-buyer cases the original creditor sold the debt through multiple intermediate buyers, and any unlicensed entity in that chain can be a problem for the plaintiff. Always start by checking the license status of the named plaintiff and any collection law firm sending correspondence on its behalf. Even when an agency is licensed, the bond requirement gives consumers another source of recovery for a judgment.

How long does a creditor have to sue me on a debt in New Mexico?

New Mexico's statute of limitations is six years on most written contracts (NMSA 37-1-3) and four years on open accounts and oral contracts (NMSA 37-1-4). Most credit-card and store-card agreements are treated as written contracts under the credit-card agreement itself, so the six-year period typically applies, though some New Mexico courts have applied four years to certain credit-card claims. The clock generally begins running from the date of last payment or default. Once the limit has run, the debt is time-barred and you have a complete defense, but you must raise the defense affirmatively in your answer. A time-barred debt remains payable voluntarily, but suing or threatening suit on a time-barred debt violates the FDCPA and the NM Unfair Practices Act. Be careful with partial payments and written acknowledgments, which can restart the clock in some circumstances. If unsure of dates, send a written validation request and pull your credit reports.

What does the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act add to my federal FDCPA rights?

The federal FDCPA regulates third-party debt collectors and debt buyers but generally does not reach the original creditor. The New Mexico Unfair Practices Act, NMSA 57-12-1 et seq., is broader and prohibits unfair, deceptive, or unconscionable trade practices by any business, including original creditors. Remedies include actual damages with a statutory floor, treble damages for unconscionable practices, mandatory attorney fees, and equitable relief. The UPA gives New Mexico consumers two layers of protection: an FDCPA claim against the third-party collector and a UPA claim against the underlying business or original creditor, which can substantially increase settlement value. The Consumer Protection Division within the New Mexico Department of Justice enforces the UPA and accepts complaints. Practical examples include misrepresented balances, deceptive validation responses, threats of action the collector did not intend to take, and continued collection after a written dispute without proper validation.

What if I live on a pueblo or reservation in New Mexico and I am being sued?

Tribal sovereignty creates important jurisdictional considerations in New Mexico collection cases. State courts generally do not have jurisdiction over a tribal member residing on a pueblo or reservation for a debt cause of action arising on the reservation, although the rules become more complex when the debt was incurred off-reservation or when the consumer engaged with non-tribal businesses outside the reservation. Service of process on a reservation must follow tribal rules and may not be effective if it does not. If you have been served with a state court collection lawsuit while living on a pueblo or reservation, get advice from a tribal court or a consumer law attorney familiar with these issues quickly, because the analysis is fact-specific and the deadlines to respond are short. Wage garnishment and bank levy enforcement against tribal members can also be limited. In any case, do not ignore the papers; raise the jurisdictional issue in writing and on the record.

How much can a New Mexico collector garnish from my wages?

New Mexico wage garnishment is calculated under NMSA 35-12-7 and related federal law. The maximum garnishment is the lesser of 25 percent of disposable earnings or the amount by which weekly disposable earnings exceed 40 times the federal minimum wage, which is more protective for lower-wage earners than the standard federal 30-times multiplier. Disposable earnings means earnings after legally required deductions. Federal benefits including Social Security, SSI, VA, and most federal pensions are fully exempt from garnishment by private creditors. Garnishment requires a judgment first; a collector who threatens immediate wage garnishment before getting a judgment is making a misleading statement and may violate the FDCPA. Once a garnishment is issued, you have the right to claim exemptions by filing the appropriate exemption claim with the court. Document any threats made before judgment and consider whether they support an FDCPA or NMSA 57-12 counterclaim.