Sued by Encore Capital Group in Minnesota? Here's What to Do Next

2015 · consent order

$52M+ total ($42M consumer refunds + $10M CFPB civil money penalty), plus order to stop collection on $125M+ in debts

CFPB consent order against Encore Capital Group, Midland Funding, Midland Credit Management, and Asset Acceptance finding the companies attempted to collect debts they didn't own or that were inaccurate, relied on robo-signed affidavits in court, and pressured consumers with misrepresentations about lawsuits. The order required documentation before filing suit and disclosures when collecting on time-barred debt.

CFPB source

2020 · lawsuit settled

$15M CFPB civil money penalty + $79,308.81 consumer redress; extended 2015 order conduct provisions for five additional years

CFPB filed suit and reached a stipulated settlement finding Encore and its subsidiaries violated the 2015 consent order by suing consumers without possessing required documentation, failing to provide required disclosures when consumers requested loan documentation, and suing on debts whose statutes of limitations had expired in violation of the FDCPA and CFPA.

CFPB source

Statute of Limitations Defense

In Minnesota, the statute of limitations for credit card debt is 6 years. If your last payment was more than 6 years ago, the debt is time-barred. Encore Capital Group has been the subject of CFPB findings related to suing on time-barred debts — check your dates carefully and raise the SOL defense in your Answer.

Lack of Standing / Chain of Title

As a debt buyer, Encore Capital Group must prove they actually purchased your specific account. Demand the complete chain of title — the purchase agreement, bill of sale, and assignment documents. In Minnesota courts, failing to produce this documentation can result in dismissal.

Challenge the Amount

Demand a complete accounting from the original creditor's last statement through the current claimed balance. Any unauthorized fees, post-charge-off interest, or collection costs not in the original agreement should be disputed line by line.

Minnesota Wage Garnishment Exemptions

Federal limits apply. Minnesota also exempts public assistance and certain retirement funds.

Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act / Minnesota Collection Agency Act

In addition to the federal FDCPA, Minnesota's Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act / Minnesota Collection Agency Act may provide additional protections and remedies against Encore Capital Group's collection practices.

Minnesota Court System

Conciliation court (small claims) limit $15,000. District court for larger civil cases. Filing fees in Minnesota typically range $55-$350.

What is Encore Capital Group?

Encore Capital Group is the largest publicly traded debt buyer in the U.S. They own LVNV Funding LLC and Midland Credit Management. If you are sued by either, Encore is the parent company.

Has the CFPB taken action against Encore?

Yes. The CFPB has ordered Encore subsidiaries to pay millions in fines and restitution for illegal debt collection practices including suing without proper documentation and collecting on time-barred debts.

Can I sue Encore Capital Group?

You would typically sue the subsidiary that contacted you (LVNV Funding or Midland Credit Management), but in some cases the parent company may also be liable for directing illegal collection practices.

How does Encore get my debt?

Encore purchases portfolios of thousands of defaulted accounts from banks and credit card companies, usually for 3-5 cents per dollar. They then attempt to collect the full original balance plus interest and fees.

How long to respond in Minnesota?

20 days from personal service. 23 days if served by mail.

What is the SOL in Minnesota?

6 years for all contract types.

Does MN have a collection agency law?

Yes. The Minnesota Collection Agency Act requires collectors to be licensed and follow specific rules.

What is conciliation court?

Minnesota's small claims court, handling cases up to $15,000.

Does a debt buyer have to prove they own my debt in Minnesota?

Yes, and Minnesota courts have been notably strict about it. Under Minnesota law and case authority, a debt buyer suing on a purchased account must prove a complete chain of title from the original creditor to itself - typically through the original signed credit agreement, account statements showing the balance, and a series of assignment documents tracing every transfer of the debt. A generic "affidavit of sale" from a debt buyer's employee, without supporting documentation, is usually not enough. If the debt buyer cannot produce these records, the case can be dismissed - sometimes outright at the default-judgment stage, since Minnesota courts have grown more skeptical of bare debt-buyer claims. When you are sued by a debt buyer, your answer should specifically deny that the plaintiff owns the debt, deny the amount, and demand strict proof. Then send a discovery request asking for the original contract, all account statements, and every assignment. Most cases settle or get dismissed at that point because the documentation simply does not exist.

What is the statute of limitations on debt in Minnesota?

Minnesota has a 6-year statute of limitations on most contract debt, open accounts, and credit-card debt under Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subdivision 1. The clock runs from the date of breach - generally the date of last payment or last activity on the account. Minnesota courts have made clear that the SOL is an affirmative defense that must be pleaded in your answer or it is waived. Once the 6 years have run, a collector cannot legally obtain a Minnesota judgment on the debt if you raise the defense. Partial payments can restart the clock under Minnesota's tolling principles, so be careful about making any payment on an old debt without first confirming the dates. The federal FDCPA prohibits suing or threatening to sue on time-barred debt, and so does Minnesota's Consumer Fraud Act in some circumstances. If you receive a collection letter or summons on an old account, check the date of last payment first - if more than 6 years have passed, you may have a complete defense plus a counterclaim.

Can a Minnesota collector garnish my wages?

Yes, but only after suing you, winning a judgment, and serving a Wage Garnishment Notice on your employer under Minn. Stat. Chapter 571. Minnesota caps wage garnishment at the lesser of (a) 25% of disposable earnings or (b) the amount your disposable earnings exceed 40 times the federal minimum wage - tighter than the federal 30-times rule. Many categories of income are fully exempt: Social Security, SSI, VA, unemployment, workers' compensation, child support received, public assistance, and earned income credit. Minnesota also exempts "government assistance based on need" for at least 6 months after deposit. To stop or reduce a garnishment, file an Exemption Notice with the court within 10 days of receiving the garnishment paperwork (Minn. Stat. § 571.911 ff.). Bring proof of your income source and any hardship. Minnesota Legal Aid (1-877-696-6529 statewide) and many consumer attorneys help with wage-garnishment objections, often at no cost because of fee-shifting under federal FDCPA and Minn. Stat. § 8.31.

Is the collection agency that contacted me licensed in Minnesota?

If it is a third-party collection agency or debt buyer, it must be licensed by the Minnesota Department of Commerce under Minn. Stat. § 332.33. You can verify licensing by searching the Department of Commerce's license lookup tool. Original creditors collecting in their own name are generally exempt. Unlicensed collection activity is itself a violation of Chapter 332 and can also be the basis for a Consumer Fraud Act claim under Minn. Stat. § 325F.69. Courts have dismissed cases brought by unlicensed collectors, and an unlicensed collector who garnishes wages or freezes a bank account may be liable for the funds taken plus damages and attorney's fees. The Department of Commerce also accepts and acts on consumer complaints against licensed agencies, so even if the collector is licensed, you can report misconduct that puts their license at risk. Always check licensing as part of any response to a collection demand - it is one of the easiest ways to identify leverage.

How do I use Minnesota's private attorney general statute against a collector?

Minnesota's "private AG" statute, Minn. Stat. § 8.31, subdivision 3a, allows private individuals to sue under the consumer-fraud laws when their case implicates a "public interest." Combined with the Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act (Minn. Stat. § 325F.69) and the Collection Agencies Act (Minn. Stat. § 332.31 et seq.), it gives consumers leverage similar to a state attorney general's office. To use it: document the violations (calls, letters, false statements, threats), demonstrate that the misconduct has broader impact than just your case (a pattern of similar conduct, mass-filed lawsuits, etc.), and then sue for damages, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees. The fee-shifting feature means most Minnesota consumer attorneys will take a viable case on contingency - if you win, the collector pays the attorney. Pairing 8.31 claims with federal FDCPA claims (15 U.S.C. § 1692k - up to $1,000 statutory damages, actual damages, fees) produces strong combined remedies. The Ly v. Nystrom line of cases requires a true public interest element, so document the pattern.